<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248850</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that freight charges separately collected as &quot;to and fro&quot; rate do not require inclusion in the assessable value of explosives, following the precedent set in Majestic Auto Ltd. v. C.C.E. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they did not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s legal position, and the Board&#039;s Circular was not considered binding on the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248850</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that freight charges separately collected as &quot;to and fro&quot; rate do not require inclusion in the assessable value of explosives, following the precedent set in Majestic Auto Ltd. v. C.C.E. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they did not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s legal position, and the Board&#039;s Circular was not considered binding on the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>