<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 742 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248838</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the short term capital loss on the motor car, reducing the claim amount. However, the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in favor of the assessee for the shop renovation expenditure and computer software maintenance expenses, ruling them as revenue expenditures rather than capital in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 742 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248838</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the short term capital loss on the motor car, reducing the claim amount. However, the decisions of the CIT(A) were upheld in favor of the assessee for the shop renovation expenditure and computer software maintenance expenses, ruling them as revenue expenditures rather than capital in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>