https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248826 The Commissioner (A) allowed the respondent's refund claims for service tax on input services, leading to the Revenue's appeal. Both parties agreed on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for taxable services provided by the respondent, except for IT and system services during the relevant period. The judgment set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication by the original authority to consider the observations and submissions. The appeal was ultimately decided, and the respondent's cross objection was disposed of, emphasizing the requirement for a detailed statement for verification. en-us Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:27:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248826 The Commissioner (A) allowed the respondent's refund claims for service tax on input services, leading to the Revenue's appeal. Both parties agreed on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for taxable services provided by the respondent, except for IT and system services during the relevant period. The judgment set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication by the original authority to consider the observations and submissions. The appeal was ultimately decided, and the respondent's cross objection was disposed of, emphasizing the requirement for a detailed statement for verification. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248826