<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248819</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the appellant cited business difficulties and ill-health, supported by a medical certificate referring to hypertension and cardiac problems, but the explanation was not fully persuasive. The court nevertheless held that the refusal to condone could not be sustained and imposed a condition of deposit to the Chief Justice Relief Fund as a precondition for condonation. On compliance with that condition, the delay stood condoned and the appeal was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248819</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the appellant cited business difficulties and ill-health, supported by a medical certificate referring to hypertension and cardiac problems, but the explanation was not fully persuasive. The court nevertheless held that the refusal to condone could not be sustained and imposed a condition of deposit to the Chief Justice Relief Fund as a precondition for condonation. On compliance with that condition, the delay stood condoned and the appeal was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>