https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248807 The court rejected the respondent's limitation defense, finding the petition maintainable. It held the respondent liable to pay the claimed amount, emphasizing the refund agreement terms. Dismissing the alleged mutual settlement, the court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent, appointing the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator. The respondent was restrained from asset dealings without consent, with the case scheduled for further hearing. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248807 The court rejected the respondent's limitation defense, finding the petition maintainable. It held the respondent liable to pay the claimed amount, emphasizing the refund agreement terms. Dismissing the alleged mutual settlement, the court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent, appointing the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator. The respondent was restrained from asset dealings without consent, with the case scheduled for further hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248807