<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 708 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s order, ruling that the transactions between the parties did not fall under international transaction provisions. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the addition under Section 92CA was deleted. The reassessment proceedings issue was not extensively discussed as the transfer pricing provisions&#039; applicability was decisive. The appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 708 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the DRP&#039;s order, ruling that the transactions between the parties did not fall under international transaction provisions. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the addition under Section 92CA was deleted. The reassessment proceedings issue was not extensively discussed as the transfer pricing provisions&#039; applicability was decisive. The appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>