<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 703 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) as the appellant&#039;s actions did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on relevant case laws. The Tribunal emphasized that the absence of incorrect or false details in the return prevented the imposition of a penalty, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 703 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) as the appellant&#039;s actions did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars, based on relevant case laws. The Tribunal emphasized that the absence of incorrect or false details in the return prevented the imposition of a penalty, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>