https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165293 The Court held that a party could not reopen, in one connected appeal, a finding that had already attained finality in the other appeal arising from the same election petition. Although both appeals stemmed from the same proceeding, they concerned distinct reliefs and were separately disposed of, so the earlier dismissal became conclusive. The doctrine of res judicata and finality of judgment therefore barred reconsideration of the finding that the appellant held an office of profit. The preliminary objection was upheld and the appeal was dismissed to that extent. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165293 The Court held that a party could not reopen, in one connected appeal, a finding that had already attained finality in the other appeal arising from the same election petition. Although both appeals stemmed from the same proceeding, they concerned distinct reliefs and were separately disposed of, so the earlier dismissal became conclusive. The doctrine of res judicata and finality of judgment therefore barred reconsideration of the finding that the appellant held an office of profit. The preliminary objection was upheld and the appeal was dismissed to that extent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165293