https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165292 The Steel Development Fund was created under administrative arrangements linked to the Iron and Steel (Control) Order, 1956, and its corpus came from contributions by member main steel plants during price control. The petitioners, as non-members of the Joint Plant Committee who had not contributed to the fund and entered production after contributions ceased, had no enforceable right to claim financial assistance or to challenge the fund's utilisation for the benefit of member steel plants. The fund was earmarked for modernisation, research and development, and related purposes for that defined class of beneficiaries, so no parity or independent entitlement arose in favour of the petitioners. Leave under Article 136 was therefore not warranted. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165292 The Steel Development Fund was created under administrative arrangements linked to the Iron and Steel (Control) Order, 1956, and its corpus came from contributions by member main steel plants during price control. The petitioners, as non-members of the Joint Plant Committee who had not contributed to the fund and entered production after contributions ceased, had no enforceable right to claim financial assistance or to challenge the fund's utilisation for the benefit of member steel plants. The fund was earmarked for modernisation, research and development, and related purposes for that defined class of beneficiaries, so no parity or independent entitlement arose in favour of the petitioners. Leave under Article 136 was therefore not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165292