https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248785 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to a 200% tax exemption on fixed capital investment. The court found that the Notification dated 19.7.1996 was not contradictory to the Industrial Policy of 1994 and that the petitioner's claims were barred by laches due to the delayed filing of the petition. Additionally, the court affirmed that it did not have the authority to mandate changes in the State Government's tax exemption policies. en-us Wed, 14 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248785 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to a 200% tax exemption on fixed capital investment. The court found that the Notification dated 19.7.1996 was not contradictory to the Industrial Policy of 1994 and that the petitioner's claims were barred by laches due to the delayed filing of the petition. Additionally, the court affirmed that it did not have the authority to mandate changes in the State Government's tax exemption policies. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 14 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248785