<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 688 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248784</link>
    <description>The court held that the priority of the State&#039;s claim for tax dues under the CST Act is upheld, applying the provisions of Section 50 of the RST Act to the recovery of CST dues. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the legislative intent and constitutional provisions supporting the State&#039;s precedence over secured creditors in tax recovery, ensuring uniformity across States.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 688 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248784</link>
      <description>The court held that the priority of the State&#039;s claim for tax dues under the CST Act is upheld, applying the provisions of Section 50 of the RST Act to the recovery of CST dues. The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the legislative intent and constitutional provisions supporting the State&#039;s precedence over secured creditors in tax recovery, ensuring uniformity across States.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>