https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248779 The Member (T) upheld the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed by the Adjudicating Authority on the respondent for violating the proviso to Rule 8(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the Revenue's appeal seeking an enhanced penalty of Rs. 95,000, ruling that the penalty already imposed was adequate. The respondent's challenges regarding internet connectivity issues and dual signatories for financial transactions were considered, leading to the decision that the existing penalty was sufficient, and thus the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:47:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248779 The Member (T) upheld the penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed by the Adjudicating Authority on the respondent for violating the proviso to Rule 8(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Commissioner (Appeals) had dismissed the Revenue's appeal seeking an enhanced penalty of Rs. 95,000, ruling that the penalty already imposed was adequate. The respondent's challenges regarding internet connectivity issues and dual signatories for financial transactions were considered, leading to the decision that the existing penalty was sufficient, and thus the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248779