https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248774 Under the safeguard duty scheme, the designated authority's final findings are only recommendations, while the Central Government makes the operative decision on levy, rate and period by notification. A writ challenge filed before issuance of that notification was therefore premature, because the legal consequence had not yet crystallised. Interference under Article 226 was declined at this stage, but the petitioner retained liberty to challenge the ultimate notification in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248774 Under the safeguard duty scheme, the designated authority's final findings are only recommendations, while the Central Government makes the operative decision on levy, rate and period by notification. A writ challenge filed before issuance of that notification was therefore premature, because the legal consequence had not yet crystallised. Interference under Article 226 was declined at this stage, but the petitioner retained liberty to challenge the ultimate notification in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248774