<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 665 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and deleting the addition of interest income of Rs. 1,98,33,263. The Tribunal held that since the interest was waived and not recognized by the other party, it did not accrue to the assessee, following the principle that hypothetical income cannot be taxed. The appeal was disposed of on its merits, and the alternative plea raised by the assessee became irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 665 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and deleting the addition of interest income of Rs. 1,98,33,263. The Tribunal held that since the interest was waived and not recognized by the other party, it did not accrue to the assessee, following the principle that hypothetical income cannot be taxed. The appeal was disposed of on its merits, and the alternative plea raised by the assessee became irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>