<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165289</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the terms of the standard fire policy, including Condition 10, applied in the case. The cancellation of the policy was deemed valid as it occurred before the risk had commenced or become inevitable. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Divisional Bench&#039;s decision and reinstating the judgment of the single Judge, dismissing the suit without any cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165289</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the terms of the standard fire policy, including Condition 10, applied in the case. The cancellation of the policy was deemed valid as it occurred before the risk had commenced or become inevitable. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Divisional Bench&#039;s decision and reinstating the judgment of the single Judge, dismissing the suit without any cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>