https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248755 The tribunal rejected M/s. N-Teek Financials' appeal against the Order-In-Appeal confirming the demand of Service Tax. The judgment determined that the services provided were not covered under 'provision of services on behalf of the client,' making the exemption notifications inapplicable. The tribunal held the Appellants liable for penalty under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act 1994, as they deliberately evaded paying Service Tax. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the tax liability of the Appellants based on the nature of services rendered and non-compliance with tax regulations. en-us Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248755 The tribunal rejected M/s. N-Teek Financials' appeal against the Order-In-Appeal confirming the demand of Service Tax. The judgment determined that the services provided were not covered under 'provision of services on behalf of the client,' making the exemption notifications inapplicable. The tribunal held the Appellants liable for penalty under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act 1994, as they deliberately evaded paying Service Tax. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the tax liability of the Appellants based on the nature of services rendered and non-compliance with tax regulations. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248755