<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 656 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248752</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore granted waiver and stay of recovery to the appellant based on the issue of limitation, emphasizing the timeline of correspondence and registration under BAS. The Tribunal found the findings of the adjudicating authority insufficient to justify the penalty under Section 78, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the confirmed demand of service tax and education cesses totaling over Rs.4.48 crores. The classification of the activity under &#039;manpower recruitment or supply agency service&#039; based on agreements with Infosys and IBM was a key point of contention, with the Tribunal ultimately siding with the appellant on the grounds of limitation and supporting documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 656 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248752</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore granted waiver and stay of recovery to the appellant based on the issue of limitation, emphasizing the timeline of correspondence and registration under BAS. The Tribunal found the findings of the adjudicating authority insufficient to justify the penalty under Section 78, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the confirmed demand of service tax and education cesses totaling over Rs.4.48 crores. The classification of the activity under &#039;manpower recruitment or supply agency service&#039; based on agreements with Infosys and IBM was a key point of contention, with the Tribunal ultimately siding with the appellant on the grounds of limitation and supporting documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>