<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 648 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248744</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the appellant was not liable to pay duty on stapler pins supplied free of cost as part of a promotional scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not undertake any additional activity on the stapler pins procured from other manufacturers, as duty had already been paid on them. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was no justification for imposing duty on the same stapler pins again and allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition unconditionally, dispensing with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 648 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248744</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the appellant was not liable to pay duty on stapler pins supplied free of cost as part of a promotional scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not undertake any additional activity on the stapler pins procured from other manufacturers, as duty had already been paid on them. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was no justification for imposing duty on the same stapler pins again and allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition unconditionally, dispensing with the pre-deposit of duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>