<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248742</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies only to a personal search and not to recovery from a bag or other container carried by an accused; the conviction was sustained because the seizure was from the gunny bag and not from the body, and the defence challenge lacked factual support. The substantive sentence and fine were maintained, but the default sentence for non-payment of fine was reduced from two years to one year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248742</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 applies only to a personal search and not to recovery from a bag or other container carried by an accused; the conviction was sustained because the seizure was from the gunny bag and not from the body, and the defence challenge lacked factual support. The substantive sentence and fine were maintained, but the default sentence for non-payment of fine was reduced from two years to one year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>