<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 628 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Goods Transport Agency, in a case involving eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 1/06-ST. The appellant had availed of Cenvat credit on input services, which was subsequently reversed upon realizing the error. The Tribunal held that the reversal of Cenvat credit satisfied the exemption condition, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and determining that the exemption applied, while also finding the penalty under Section 78 unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 628 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Goods Transport Agency, in a case involving eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 1/06-ST. The appellant had availed of Cenvat credit on input services, which was subsequently reversed upon realizing the error. The Tribunal held that the reversal of Cenvat credit satisfied the exemption condition, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal and determining that the exemption applied, while also finding the penalty under Section 78 unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>