<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248715</link>
    <description>Notification No. 74/93-CE dated 20.02.1993 was held inapplicable to PCC poles manufactured and cleared by a State Electricity Board because the Board could not be treated as the State Government or its department. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that a State Electricity Board is a separate legal entity, and that 100% State Government ownership or shareholding does not place it on par with the Government for exemption purposes. As the statutory conditions requiring manufacture in a factory belonging to the State Government for use by a Government department were not met, the exemption benefit was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 619 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248715</link>
      <description>Notification No. 74/93-CE dated 20.02.1993 was held inapplicable to PCC poles manufactured and cleared by a State Electricity Board because the Board could not be treated as the State Government or its department. The Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that a State Electricity Board is a separate legal entity, and that 100% State Government ownership or shareholding does not place it on par with the Government for exemption purposes. As the statutory conditions requiring manufacture in a factory belonging to the State Government for use by a Government department were not met, the exemption benefit was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>