<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 617 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248713</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed M/s Indian Smelting &amp;amp; Refining Co. Ltd. to deposit a specified amount within a given timeframe for the waiver of the remaining pre-deposit amount, interest, and penalties, with recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The judgment addressed issues of denial of credit, discrepancies in statements, reliance on evidence, lack of cross-examination opportunity, and the requirement of a deposit amount for the appeal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 617 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248713</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed M/s Indian Smelting &amp;amp; Refining Co. Ltd. to deposit a specified amount within a given timeframe for the waiver of the remaining pre-deposit amount, interest, and penalties, with recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The judgment addressed issues of denial of credit, discrepancies in statements, reliance on evidence, lack of cross-examination opportunity, and the requirement of a deposit amount for the appeal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>