<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 589 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248685</link>
    <description>Inter-State purchases of goods used in execution of a works contract were held outside the charging power under Section 5-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, because the definition of taxable turnover excludes turnover arising from inter-State trade or commerce. Goods procured from outside the State with the purchaser&#039;s approval and delivered for the project site were treated as movement occasioned by and incidental to the contract. The Forty-sixth Amendment did not enlarge State taxing power beyond Article 286 and the Central Sales Tax Act scheme. The revisional order taxing the turnover was set aside and exemption restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 589 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248685</link>
      <description>Inter-State purchases of goods used in execution of a works contract were held outside the charging power under Section 5-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, because the definition of taxable turnover excludes turnover arising from inter-State trade or commerce. Goods procured from outside the State with the purchaser&#039;s approval and delivered for the project site were treated as movement occasioned by and incidental to the contract. The Forty-sixth Amendment did not enlarge State taxing power beyond Article 286 and the Central Sales Tax Act scheme. The revisional order taxing the turnover was set aside and exemption restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>