<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248679</link>
    <description>The Division Bench referred the issue of an assessee&#039;s eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid on services at wind mills situated away from factory premises to a Larger Bench due to conflicting views within the Tribunal. The decision aimed to resolve the controversy and establish a consistent position on the matter, acknowledging the need for clarification and uniformity in interpreting the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248679</link>
      <description>The Division Bench referred the issue of an assessee&#039;s eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid on services at wind mills situated away from factory premises to a Larger Bench due to conflicting views within the Tribunal. The decision aimed to resolve the controversy and establish a consistent position on the matter, acknowledging the need for clarification and uniformity in interpreting the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>