<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248676</link>
    <description>A clerical error in a bill of entry stating the consignment value in Euro instead of US Dollars was treated as an obvious typographical mistake where the imported goods were in fact valued in US Dollars and the Revenue did not dispute that position. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore justified in rectifying the entry, and no legal infirmity was found in the correction. The challenge by the Revenue was rejected, and the rectification in the bill of entry was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:27:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 580 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248676</link>
      <description>A clerical error in a bill of entry stating the consignment value in Euro instead of US Dollars was treated as an obvious typographical mistake where the imported goods were in fact valued in US Dollars and the Revenue did not dispute that position. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore justified in rectifying the entry, and no legal infirmity was found in the correction. The challenge by the Revenue was rejected, and the rectification in the bill of entry was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>