<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 570 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of an addition for excess depreciation on computer peripherals, citing a precedent allowing higher depreciation rates. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal directed exclusion of investments in foreign companies from the computation of exempt assets, partially allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:51:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 570 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of an addition for excess depreciation on computer peripherals, citing a precedent allowing higher depreciation rates. Regarding the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the Tribunal directed exclusion of investments in foreign companies from the computation of exempt assets, partially allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>