https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165279 The appeals challenging the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling of Holdings) Act, 1961 and its amendments were dismissed. However, the appeals by the State of Punjab and the State of Uttar Pradesh were allowed, upholding the validity of the respective land reform laws. The court emphasized the broad protective scope of Article 31-B and the necessity of agrarian reform legislation in achieving socio-economic justice. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 08:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165279 The appeals challenging the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling of Holdings) Act, 1961 and its amendments were dismissed. However, the appeals by the State of Punjab and the State of Uttar Pradesh were allowed, upholding the validity of the respective land reform laws. The court emphasized the broad protective scope of Article 31-B and the necessity of agrarian reform legislation in achieving socio-economic justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165279