<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165278</link>
    <description>A disputed claim for damages does not become a debt until liability is adjudicated and damages are assessed. Clause 18 was construed as a recovery provision limited to sums presently due and payable, so it could not authorise unilateral appropriation of amounts payable under other contracts against an unadjudicated damage claim. The interim injunction merely restrained appropriation and did not compel payment, so it was within the court&#039;s power in support of arbitration. The restraint was sustained and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 105 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165278</link>
      <description>A disputed claim for damages does not become a debt until liability is adjudicated and damages are assessed. Clause 18 was construed as a recovery provision limited to sums presently due and payable, so it could not authorise unilateral appropriation of amounts payable under other contracts against an unadjudicated damage claim. The interim injunction merely restrained appropriation and did not compel payment, so it was within the court&#039;s power in support of arbitration. The restraint was sustained and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>