<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 525 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248621</link>
    <description>The judge upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to deny input service credit for services used in a residential colony outside the factory, ruling that such services lacked nexus with the manufacturing business. Citing the Manikgarh Cement case, the judge determined that services in a residential colony do not qualify for input service credit, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 525 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248621</link>
      <description>The judge upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to deny input service credit for services used in a residential colony outside the factory, ruling that such services lacked nexus with the manufacturing business. Citing the Manikgarh Cement case, the judge determined that services in a residential colony do not qualify for input service credit, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>