<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The assessee&#039;s claim, supported by a legal opinion and transparent disclosure, did not warrant a penalty. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The assessee&#039;s claim, supported by a legal opinion and transparent disclosure, did not warrant a penalty. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>