<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of proceedings to the appellant, subject to a deposit covering the prima facie tax liability. The Karnataka High Court directed the Tribunal to address the remaining tax demand, resulting in a refund to the appellant of a portion of the amount recovered by the Revenue. The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to refund a specific sum to the appellant based on the preliminary liability assessment and the conditional order of pre-deposit and stay, concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 491 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of proceedings to the appellant, subject to a deposit covering the prima facie tax liability. The Karnataka High Court directed the Tribunal to address the remaining tax demand, resulting in a refund to the appellant of a portion of the amount recovered by the Revenue. The Tribunal ordered the Revenue to refund a specific sum to the appellant based on the preliminary liability assessment and the conditional order of pre-deposit and stay, concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>