<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248586</link>
    <description>Service tax on inter-State and intra-State bus plying under a contract carriage permit was not sustainable for the period 1-4-2000 to 31-3-2004 because the activity fell within the exemption for tour operators plying buses from point to point. The exemption was given retrospective effect from 1-4-2000 by the Finance Act, 2011, so the demand related to a period covered by that retrospective exemption and could not be recovered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 490 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248586</link>
      <description>Service tax on inter-State and intra-State bus plying under a contract carriage permit was not sustainable for the period 1-4-2000 to 31-3-2004 because the activity fell within the exemption for tour operators plying buses from point to point. The exemption was given retrospective effect from 1-4-2000 by the Finance Act, 2011, so the demand related to a period covered by that retrospective exemption and could not be recovered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>