<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 486 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, directing them to grant cross-examination as requested by the appellant, allow time for a detailed reply, provide a personal hearing, and then pass a reasoned order. Both appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 486 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, directing them to grant cross-examination as requested by the appellant, allow time for a detailed reply, provide a personal hearing, and then pass a reasoned order. Both appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>