<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 592 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165270</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that there was no siphoning of extra funds to the refinery by oil companies. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument that the agreement did not reflect the true transaction value, noting it was in compliance with government directives to reduce transportation costs and serve mutual interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 592 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165270</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling that there was no siphoning of extra funds to the refinery by oil companies. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument that the agreement did not reflect the true transaction value, noting it was in compliance with government directives to reduce transportation costs and serve mutual interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>