<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 459 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248555</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of a refund claim as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s erroneous payment of service tax, not required by law, rendered Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 inapplicable. The tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with a precedent from the Madras High Court in a comparable matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 459 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248555</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of a refund claim as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s erroneous payment of service tax, not required by law, rendered Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 inapplicable. The tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with a precedent from the Madras High Court in a comparable matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>