https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248544 The Central Society successfully argued that they were entitled to a refund of the duty borne by them as the duty incidence had not been passed on to their customers. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of specific facts and legal precedents in determining the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in refund claims. The judgment favored the Central Society, allowing their appeal with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248544 The Central Society successfully argued that they were entitled to a refund of the duty borne by them as the duty incidence had not been passed on to their customers. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of specific facts and legal precedents in determining the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment in refund claims. The judgment favored the Central Society, allowing their appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248544