<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248529</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted a stay for six months or until the appeal&#039;s disposal, whichever came first, in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning a transfer pricing adjustment under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2009-10. The decision was based on the balance of convenience, with a caution against seeking adjournments without valid reasons to avoid vacating the stay. The order was issued on May 30, 2014, providing relief to the Assessee regarding the outstanding demand amounting to Rs.80.73 lacs, including interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248529</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted a stay for six months or until the appeal&#039;s disposal, whichever came first, in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning a transfer pricing adjustment under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2009-10. The decision was based on the balance of convenience, with a caution against seeking adjournments without valid reasons to avoid vacating the stay. The order was issued on May 30, 2014, providing relief to the Assessee regarding the outstanding demand amounting to Rs.80.73 lacs, including interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>