<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities to impose penalties under Section 78 and not under Section 76 in a case involving non-filing of returns and non-payment of service tax liability. The appeal by the revenue was rejected based on the specific circumstances and legal precedents cited, including decisions of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The Tribunal found that invoking Section 78 and imposing a penalty justified not imposing a penalty under Section 76, as per relevant legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities to impose penalties under Section 78 and not under Section 76 in a case involving non-filing of returns and non-payment of service tax liability. The appeal by the revenue was rejected based on the specific circumstances and legal precedents cited, including decisions of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The Tribunal found that invoking Section 78 and imposing a penalty justified not imposing a penalty under Section 76, as per relevant legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>