<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 421 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248517</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants regarding the availing of CENVAT credit on input services used for both service provision and sales. The penalty for inadvertently taking the credit was reduced from Rs. 71,965 to Rs. 2,000 as the appellants genuinely believed they were entitled to the credit, falling under Rule 15(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:48:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 421 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248517</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants regarding the availing of CENVAT credit on input services used for both service provision and sales. The penalty for inadvertently taking the credit was reduced from Rs. 71,965 to Rs. 2,000 as the appellants genuinely believed they were entitled to the credit, falling under Rule 15(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>