<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248505</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as it did not raise any substantial questions of law. The decision of the Tribunal regarding the disallowance of expenses and commission sums was upheld, with no costs awarded in the case. The Tribunal&#039;s restoration of proceedings to the Assessing Officer for quantification of disallowance under section 14A was found appropriate, with the disallowance on administrative expenses being upheld while the disallowance on interest expenditure was deemed unsustainable. The disallowance of petty commission sums was also upheld, as the lack of details and confirmations regarding services rendered by individuals was not adequately addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:02:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248505</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal as it did not raise any substantial questions of law. The decision of the Tribunal regarding the disallowance of expenses and commission sums was upheld, with no costs awarded in the case. The Tribunal&#039;s restoration of proceedings to the Assessing Officer for quantification of disallowance under section 14A was found appropriate, with the disallowance on administrative expenses being upheld while the disallowance on interest expenditure was deemed unsustainable. The disallowance of petty commission sums was also upheld, as the lack of details and confirmations regarding services rendered by individuals was not adequately addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>