<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed short term capital loss of Rs. 1,65,077, as the transactions were deemed non-genuine based on the lack of share delivery, payment, and STT, coupled with the Director&#039;s admission of fraudulent billing practices. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow the claimed short term capital loss of Rs. 1,65,077, as the transactions were deemed non-genuine based on the lack of share delivery, payment, and STT, coupled with the Director&#039;s admission of fraudulent billing practices. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>