<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 397 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248493</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partly allowed the appeal, granting relief of Rs.6,00,000/- to the assessee from the addition of Rs.26,27,000/- made under sec. 68 of the Act. The tribunal considered the opening capital balance and past income in assessing the source of funds, emphasizing the importance of providing sufficient explanations for cash deposits. The decision highlighted discrepancies in the assessee&#039;s financial history and concluded that the explanation provided was inadequate, leading to the modification of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 397 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248493</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partly allowed the appeal, granting relief of Rs.6,00,000/- to the assessee from the addition of Rs.26,27,000/- made under sec. 68 of the Act. The tribunal considered the opening capital balance and past income in assessing the source of funds, emphasizing the importance of providing sufficient explanations for cash deposits. The decision highlighted discrepancies in the assessee&#039;s financial history and concluded that the explanation provided was inadequate, leading to the modification of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>