<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 392 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248488</link>
    <description>Simultaneous penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period before 10.05.2008 was treated as a disputed legal question because conflicting High Court views existed on whether both penalties could be imposed together. The Tribunal did not decide the merits itself and instead referred the issue to a Larger Bench for authoritative resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 392 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248488</link>
      <description>Simultaneous penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for the period before 10.05.2008 was treated as a disputed legal question because conflicting High Court views existed on whether both penalties could be imposed together. The Tribunal did not decide the merits itself and instead referred the issue to a Larger Bench for authoritative resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>