<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248485</link>
    <description>Where service tax and interest were paid before issuance of the show cause notice, further penalty proceedings were barred under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee had discharged the tax liability with interest in advance of notice, and the appellate authority found no basis to sustain penalty. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the penalty was held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:19:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248485</link>
      <description>Where service tax and interest were paid before issuance of the show cause notice, further penalty proceedings were barred under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee had discharged the tax liability with interest in advance of notice, and the appellate authority found no basis to sustain penalty. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the penalty was held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>