<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 373 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248469</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of Garnishee notices issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and treated the petitioner-Society as an assessee in default for non-compliance. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the Department&#039;s right to recover tax dues from amounts held by the petitioner-Society on behalf of the assessees, directing immediate compliance or upon maturity of fixed deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 373 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248469</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of Garnishee notices issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and treated the petitioner-Society as an assessee in default for non-compliance. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the Department&#039;s right to recover tax dues from amounts held by the petitioner-Society on behalf of the assessees, directing immediate compliance or upon maturity of fixed deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>