<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 366 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, emphasizing adherence to past rulings and SEBI regulations. The information technology expenses and office license fees issues were remanded for fresh adjudication, ensuring detailed verification and consideration of additional evidence. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 366 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, emphasizing adherence to past rulings and SEBI regulations. The information technology expenses and office license fees issues were remanded for fresh adjudication, ensuring detailed verification and consideration of additional evidence. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>