https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165264 Writ interference with a fact-finding decision on a liquor-vend auction was confined to cases of perversity or manifest unreasonableness. The Financial Commissioner's rejection of the bid challenge was supported by surrounding circumstances, including the timing of bank drafts, the bidding pattern, the absence of contemporaneous protest and the observers' reports, so the finding was not shown to be perverse. The High Court's contrary view rested on inference and conjecture rather than a demonstrated flaw in that order, and the direction for re-auction was also found unworkable and unsustainable. The challenge to the auction therefore failed. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165264 Writ interference with a fact-finding decision on a liquor-vend auction was confined to cases of perversity or manifest unreasonableness. The Financial Commissioner's rejection of the bid challenge was supported by surrounding circumstances, including the timing of bank drafts, the bidding pattern, the absence of contemporaneous protest and the observers' reports, so the finding was not shown to be perverse. The High Court's contrary view rested on inference and conjecture rather than a demonstrated flaw in that order, and the direction for re-auction was also found unworkable and unsustainable. The challenge to the auction therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165264