<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to investigate the exemption claim under S.11 regarding capitation fees, verify the allowance of depreciation on fixed assets, and reexamine the provision for doubtful debts. Detailed directions were provided to ensure compliance with the law and fair assessment procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to investigate the exemption claim under S.11 regarding capitation fees, verify the allowance of depreciation on fixed assets, and reexamine the provision for doubtful debts. Detailed directions were provided to ensure compliance with the law and fair assessment procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>