<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 355 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248451</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeal in a service tax liability dispute, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs.35,00,000 instead of the initial Rs.70,00,000 pre-deposit amount. The court emphasized expediting the appeal process for resolution within six months. The decision balanced the interests of both parties based on factual issues presented, diverging from the Tribunal&#039;s lenient stance to ensure justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 355 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248451</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeal in a service tax liability dispute, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs.35,00,000 instead of the initial Rs.70,00,000 pre-deposit amount. The court emphasized expediting the appeal process for resolution within six months. The decision balanced the interests of both parties based on factual issues presented, diverging from the Tribunal&#039;s lenient stance to ensure justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>