https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248440 The Court held that the writ petition challenging a stay order and recovery proceedings was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Court granted a six-week extension for the deposit to be made, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits and staying the recovery proceedings. The petitioner was directed to follow the statutory appeal process and comply with the pre-deposit requirement within the specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248440 The Court held that the writ petition challenging a stay order and recovery proceedings was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Court granted a six-week extension for the deposit to be made, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits and staying the recovery proceedings. The petitioner was directed to follow the statutory appeal process and comply with the pre-deposit requirement within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248440